A keyword can be a person’s name, the name of an institute, an abbreviation of an organization (UN for United Nations), a word from the title of a book, words from a quote or a term that represents your topic of interest, or the combination of all of the above. The quality and value of the results of a keyword search is directly related to the keywords which are chosen.
Because a keyword search simply matches on a character string, no assumption should be made with respect to the absolute accuracy and comprehensiveness of the results. The resultant report should be considered as providing "suggestions" or "possibilities" rather than answers. Some of the "matching" projects may not be matches at all and some "real" matches may not be included.
For example, a search for the keyword "liver" would "match" a document with a title that includes the word "delivery", even though it bears no relationship whatsoever to the topic "liver". This is a false match. Conversely, a search using the keyword "ASEAN" will not report a match on a document which includes the word "Thailand" but not the word "ASEAN". In this case, a "real" match is not reported.
Some guidelines for choosing keywords in searches are as follows:
Search engines are best at finding unique keywords, phrases, quotes, and information buried in the full-text of web pages. Because they index word by word, search engines are also useful in retrieving tons of documents. If you want a wide range of responses to specific queries, use a search engine.
However, sometimes searches do not go as planned, especially with complicated queries that can relate to other topics, belong to other broader concepts or narrower issues, and are even synonymous with other terms. The table below illustrates how a question develops from a broad to a focused question. Please note that you may use dictionaries or thesauri.
Broad Topic | Restricted Topic | Narrowed Topic | Related Topic |
ASIA |
AEC |
ASEAN |
ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation |
Education |
Regional harmonization of education |
Higher education and harmonization |
Modernization of higher education |
Fishing |
Commercial fishing |
Fishing regulations in the Indian Ocean |
Inter-governmental roles in regional fishing |
Activities
Text from HowToGeek.com (n.d.). How to Search Google Like a Pro: 11 Tricks You Have to Know.
Some great search tips:
This same method now works for exact-word queries. For example, if you search for ‘mining’ Google will also show pages that contain the words ‘miners’. Previously, you’d use a plus sign and search for +mining, but now you have to enclose the word in quotes: “mining”
linux distributions -ubuntu
site:howtogeek.com windows 7
You can also use the ‘site:’ operation to specify a domain. For example, if you’re looking for high-quality references, you could use site:.edu to pull up results from only .edu domains.
“google purchased * for * dollars”
ubuntu 2004..2010
filetype:pdf how to geek
ubuntu OR linux
define:word
Activities
The World Wide Web offers information and data from all over the world. Because so much information is available, and because that information can appear to be fairly “anonymous”, it is necessary to develop skills to evaluate what you find. When you use a research or academic library, the books, journals and other resources have already been evaluated by scholars, publishers and librarians. Every resource you find has been evaluated in one way or another before you ever see it. When you are using the World Wide Web, none of this applies. There are no filters. Because anyone can write a web page, documents of the widest range of quality, written by authors of the widest range of authority, are available on an even playing field.
Text from Avery, S. (2012, August 29). Evaluating Internet. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
The questions below will help you evaluate web pages for use as academic sources. Be sure and look at the criteria in multiple categories prior to making a decision regarding the academic quality of a source.
How did you find the page?
How you located the site can give you a start on your evaluation of the site's validity as an academic resource.
Q: Was it found via a search conducted through a search engine?
Evaluation: Unlike library databases, the accuracy and/or quality of information located via a search engine
will vary greatly. Look carefully!
Q: Was it recommended by a faculty member or another reliable source?
Evaluation: Generally, this is an indicator of reliability.
Q: Was it cited in a scholarly or credible source?
Evaluation: Generally, this is an indicator of reliability.
Q: Was it a link from a reputable site?
Evaluation: Generally, this is an indicator of reliability.
What is the site's domain?
Think of this as "decoding" the URL (Uniform Resource Locator), or internet address. The origination of the site can provide indications of the site's mission or purpose. The most common domains are as follows:
.org: An advocacy website, such as a non-profit organization
.com: A business or commercial site
.net: A site from a network organization or an internet service provider
.edu: A site affiliated with a higher education institution
.gov: A federal government site
.il.us: A state government site, this may also include public schools and community colleges
.uk: (United Kingdom) A site originating in another country (as indicated by the 2 letter code)
.th: (Thailand) A site originating in Thailand
~: The tilde usually indicates a personal page
What is the authority of the page?
Look for information on the author of the site. On the internet anyone can pose as an authority.
Is the author's name visible? Does the author have an affiliation with an organization or institution?
Does the author list his or her credentials? Are they relevant to the information presented?
Is there a mailing address or telephone number included, as well as an e-mail address?
Is the information accurate and objective?
There are no standards or controls on the accuracy of information available via the internet. The internet can be used by anyone as a sounding board for their thoughts and opinions.
How accurate is the information presented? Are sources of factual information or statistics cited? Is there a bibliography included?
Compare the page to related sources, electronic or print, for assistance in determining accuracy.
Does the page exhibit a particular point of view or bias?
Is the site objective? Is there a reason the site is presenting a particular point of view on a topic?
Does the page contain advertising?
This may impact the content of the information included. Look carefully to see if there is a relationship between the advertising and the content, or whether the advertising is simply providing financial support for the page.
Is the page current?
This is both an indicator of the timeliness of the information and whether or not the page is actively maintained.
Is the information provided current?
When was the page created?
Are dates included for the last update or modification of the page?
Are the links current and functional?
Does the page function well?
The ease of use of a site and its ability to help you locate the information you are looking for are examples of the site's functionality.
Is the site easy to navigate? Are options to return to the home page, tops of pages, etc., provided?
Is the site searchable?
Does the site include a site map or index?
Activities