Read the following information and answer the questions.
                
		        - The AEC development has  been criticized for being "too slow" and some observers have  said that the issues that have been delayed were those of importance and could  make or break the success of the integration. Some specialists also commented  about the lack of leadership on this issue - the role of ASEAN chairmanship is  a rotating position and a series of officials from the poorer, less developed ASEAN  countries will be the chair of ASEAN for the next few years which means that  leadership will be inexperienced and possibly be less interested in pushing  ahead quickly with integration on all fronts. Furthermore, ASEAN will suffer  the departure of a strong leader as the current ASEAN Secretary General, Thai  diplomat Surin Pitsuwan, is completing his 5-year term as ASEAN  Secretary-General this year. As an experienced diplomat, Surin Pitsuwan and  prior to him the equally experienced Ong Keng Yong from Singapore, have pushed  ahead on integration. Some observers note that the less experienced officials  from poorer and less developed ASEAN countries set to follow them will not have  the same leadership skills, experience or knowledge and that this will tell on  future progress.
		      
 - Infrastructure development among the ASEAN countries: both the development  of hard infrastructure such as roads, ports, airports, etc. and soft  infrastructure such as human resource and training are being concentrated. 
Hard  infrastructure: Many countries' governments have plans to upgrade their  infrastructure, such as the plan of three highways linking ASEAN - the  North/South one linking South China through Myanmar, Thailand, Laos and Vietnam;  the East/West Corridor linking Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, and Vietnam; and the  South/South one linking Myanmar’s Dawei deep seaport, Thailand’s Laem Chabang  and Cambodia (link to our infrastructure article). Thailand's government has  also been talking to China about the high-speed train project linking Laos and  Thailand’s Nong Khai to the southern border and Malaysia. 
For soft  infrastructure, better English speaking countries in ASEAN, such as Singapore,  Malaysia and the Philippines will have an advantage over countries like  Thailand. According to the Bangkok Post, Thailand has established the ‘‘English  Speaking Year 2012’’ program in preparation for the merging of the AEC. This is  a step in the right direction but what is ultimately needed is not only a  program but a new mind-set. Thailand has not given enough attention to  improving English skills throughout its education system and now is in a  somewhat weaker position than countries such as Vietnam who have given  increased attention to this, and also benefit from having a western alphabet  that makes learning of English, both reading and writing, easier than in  Thailand. 
- The  banking sector will particularly need to stay ahead of the game to  facilitate investors and to support their moves throughout the region.  Singaporean and Malaysian banks and telecoms, for instance, have invested  heavily in the region and seem to be slightly ahead of other competitors in  better preparing themselves for the AEC.
- Executives  have to adjust strategy. Inside the AEC, managers will increasingly have to  pursue sales opportunities across the region while focusing relentlessly on  cost efficiencies by integrating their operations across the region, managing  through lean techniques but also developing effective corporate centralization.  Externally, managers in countries such as the US, Canada and Europe are going  to have to start paying better attention to this new opportunity. Many of them  right now seem to have eyes for only China and India. Asia is much more than  either of these two countries and western managers need to study and better  understand the opportunities that the AEC presents. In China and India, the AEC  also is not fully appreciated nor understood and both Indian and Chinese  managers need to also focus more attention and to travel and address the  opportunities that the AEC presents.
- ASEAN  members still view each other as competitors, for inbound investment and  jobs, reported USITC. Ultimately, these distinctions should start to fade to  some extent but in the future the line between competitor and collaborator  within ASEAN may become less clear. The ASEAN members will need legally binding  means to enforce compliance with the objectives of the roadmaps, suggested the  report. 
What’s Next?
These are vast and ambitious pursuits, and 2015 is less than three years away. Businesses need to have an  international mindset, which gives them the appetite and ability to make  cross-border investments and acquisitions. Momentum has been established, as  seen from many investments and merger and acquisition activity that has  occurred in the region. In Thailand, Siam Cement, one of Thailand's largest  conglomerates, is gearing up to spend 75% of its $5-billion investment budget  for 2012-16 to acquire assets, many in ASEAN countries, according to the  Bangkok Post, and there are other large companies such as CP or BGH that are  doing the same. In the Philippines, the Philippine pharmaceutical company  Unilab markets its affordable analgesics and cough and cold mixtures all over  Southeast Asia through joint ventures, while the Axiata group of mobile  operators is looking into network-sharing, according to the Manila times.  Indonesia's AirAsia, Asia's largest budget airline, is opening a regional  office in Jakarta to engage with the ASEAN Secretariat there and work toward a  single ASEAN sky and aviation authority, reported the Jakarta Post. In late  2011, a group of business luminaries, including the CEOs of CIMB Bank, AirAsia,  Bangkok Bank and Ayala Group launched the ASEAN Business Club, a private-sector  initiative to engage in ASEAN's community building efforts. 
The AEC is definitely a work in progress. Some efforts will go faster and bear  quicker fruit than others; others will face more challenges and may be less  crisply implemented. Still, we believe the future is clearly in favor of the  AEC, and that it offers clear opportunities and challenges that all businesses  need to be thinking about and preparing for. Those who fail to do so, have no  one to blame but themselves for missing out on a wonderful new opportunity for  sales, investment and engagement with Asia.
About  the Author: 
                
              Christopher W. Runckel, a former senior US diplomat who served in many counties  in Asia, is a graduate of the University of Oregon and Lewis and Clark Law  School. He served as Deputy General Counsel of President Gerald Ford’s  Presidential Clemency Board. Mr. Runckel is the principal and founder of  Runckel& Associates, a Portland, Oregon based consulting company that  assists businesses expand business opportunities in Asia.  (www.business-in-asia.com)
  
              Until April of 1999, Mr. Runckel was Minister-Counselor of the US Embassy in  Beijing, China. Mr. Runckel lived and worked in Thailand for over six years. He  was the first permanently assigned U.S. diplomat to return to Vietnam after the  Vietnam War. In 1997, he was awarded the U.S. Department of States highest  award for service, the Distinguished Honor Award, for his contribution to  improving U.S.-Vietnam relations. 
  | 
                ||
1. Why has the AEC development been criticized for being too slow?  | 
                
  | 
                
  | 
              
2. What is one problem of leadership?  | 
                
  | 
              |
3. Infrastructure development: What is being done in terms of hard infrastructure?  | 
                
  | 
              |
4. What is being done for soft infrastructure?  | 
                
  | 
              |
5. What is the problem about English speaking in Thailand?  | 
                ||
| 6. The banking sector: Who in the banking sector better prepares to facilitate investors throughout the region? | ||
| 7. Executives have to adjust strategy: How should executives adjust their strategy inside the AEC?  | 
                ||
| 8. What is the attitude of ASEAN members toward each other? | ||
| 9. What’s next? | ||
| 10. What does the author believe? |